The key concern of Tobacco Control would be to give a forum for research, analysis, commentary, and debate on policies, programmes, and methods which are more likely to further the objectives of the tobacco control policy that is comprehensive. In documents submitted for review the introduction should suggest why the research reported or problems discussed are very important with regards to managing tobacco use, additionally the conversation part ought to include an analysis of how a research reported plays a part in tobacco control goals.

Documents firmly anchored to a policy that is strategic programme context are more inclined to be accepted for book. Whilst the log seeks to attain a worldwide readership, writers must look into whether their intended submissions address problems or themes, that are probably be of great interest to scientists employed in other countries. Extremely parochial dilemmas, that have few lessons for tobacco control policy outside a paper’s local context, are not likely to be provided with priority that is high. The manuscripts editors will generally speaking perhaps perhaps perhaps not offer high priority to:

• Studies of cigarette smoking prevalence and its own correlates. They are most suitable to nationwide journals. Few individuals residing outside a national nation have an interest in whether that nation has 30% or 35% of cigarette cigarette cigarette smokers.
• Knowledge, attitudes, behaviour (KAB) studies of specific population teams or health care professionals. Once more, they are better suited to national journals or even to wellness expert speciality journals. Few individuals in other nations could be enthusiastic about (for instance) whether nurses in a hospital that is regional enthusiastic about helping patients quit. Nationwide studies, and the ones using studies that are such initial areas are of more interest.
• Reports that evoke unanimous “so what?” responses from the editors. They are papers with findings that appear to hold no importance that is obvious changing policy or training in tobacco control. They frequently show methodological finery, but don’t take us anywhere essential or interesting.
• Advice pieces where in fact the views are unoriginal, badly argued, naive or neglect for crucial ethical dilemmas in favor of sloganeering.
• Documents that show the writers have not exposed Tobacco Control and don’t comprehend its main give attention to tobacco control in the place of on tobacco and its particular use and wellness effects. We have been thinking about such documents, but as long as their writers address the implications of these findings for tobacco control.
• Papers with glaringly apparent, deadly methodological dilemmas.
• Documents on topics that need very technical or discipline-specific language not likely to be recognized by the greater part of visitors.
• Documents that are replications of currently well-established findings or provide little new information.
• Neighborhood studies where in actuality the implications for the journal’s audience that is international uncertain.
• Reports written for governments or neighborhood health authorities that somebody thought could be offered a fast make-over and presented as a log paper.

Editorial policy

Tobacco Control adheres towards the greatest criteria concerning its editorial policies on book ethics, medical misconduct, permission and peer review criteria. To see all BMJ Journal policies please make reference to the BMJ Author Hub policies web web page.

Articles are posted under a licence that is exclusive non-exclusive licence for British Crown workers or where BMJ has agreed CC BY is applicable. For people authorities officers or workers acting as an element of their formal duties, the terms are as previously mentioned in accordance with our licence terms. Writers or their employers retain copyright. Start access articles could be reused underneath the regards to the appropriate imaginative Commons licence to facilitate reuse for the content; please relate to the Tobacco Control Author Licence for the applicable Creative Commons licences”.

Tobacco industry funded work

Tobacco Control will likely not start thinking about for book documents work that is reporting, in entire or in component, by way of a tobacco business or tobacco industry company. Nor will the journal consider documents by authors whom accept tobacco industry capital, including money for research expenses, for many or element of any author’s income, or other types of individual remuneration. For more information, please look at this editorial offering the thinking behind the journal’s policy. Failure to declare interests that are competing distribution, or whenever a write-up is commissioned, can lead to instant rejection regarding the paper. If your interest that is competing to light after book, Tobacco Control will issue an official modification to or retraction regarding the entire paper, as appropriate.

Material previously published online

Tobacco Control is ready to start thinking about documents based wholly or perhaps in part on material previously posted on the web. But writers must look into an editorial with this subject: Prior book on the net: brand new log policy. The editor keeps the right that is customary make modifications any way you like and when required to reduce, utilizing the approval of this author(s), product accepted for publication. Any written or illustrative product that happens to be posted somewhere else must certanly be duly recognized and associated with the penned consent regarding the copyright holder (this might be the publisher as opposed to the writer).

Fast monitoring

Under unique circumstances where a paper’s findings have actually straight away policy that is relevant warranting urgent book, manuscripts can be fast tracked prior to the normal queue of documents. In the event that you feel you feel it is of sufficient importance to be handled urgently that you have good reasons why this is true for your paper, please detail these in a cover letter, explaining the importance of your work for the field and the reason. This demand doesn’t guarantee that the editors will concur, and just a few documents per year would be expedited with this foundation, nonetheless it might help the editors to judge the paper’s value when you look at the context that is current.

Formatting, terms and revised manuscripts

Documents on electric cigarettes should utilize the term ‘electronic cigarettes’ on very first usage, and after that the abbreviation ‘e-cigarettes’ may be applied. Documents on other delivery that is nicotine may continue using the definition of ‘electronic smoking distribution systems’ accompanied by the abbreviation ‘ENDS’ after very first usage.

Whenever uploading a revised manuscript, writers must also add a different manuscript file showcasing the tracked changes to demonstrate the editors the huge difference through the previous variation. The monitored modifications document should always be uploaded as a supplementary file.

Analysis gu > that is reporting

BMJ calls for conformity towards the reporting that is following. Please upload the appropriate finished list for the submission to your study type, and label it “Research checklist”. This can be indicated on the submission form if no relevant checklist is available for your study type.

CONSORT statement – necessary for all randomised controlled studies
PRISMA statement – necessary for all systematic reviews
EVEREST statement – Required for many financial evaluations
STARD statement – Required for several research that is diagnostic
STROBE statement – necessary for all observational studies
SQUIRE statement – Required for many quality enhancement studies

Guidance and kinds can be obtained from EQUATOR.

We welcome video clip abstracts to accompany accepted research articles. These enable authors to physically talk through their work beyond the limitations of a article that is formal improve the user’s understanding. Note that people will likely not request you to start thinking about submitting a video clip abstract until your paper happens to be accepted. Please try not to attempt to upload a video clip abstract upon initial distribution of one’s manuscript.

There are lots of tutorials online which could guide the creation of a video clip abstract, using commonly and frequently software that is freely available. Windows film Maker and Apple iMovie will be the many examples that are common. Types of video clip abstracts can be obtained from The BMJ. Listed here are a few recommendations for making a video clip abstract. Writers could also like to ask their institution’s press/media workplace for http://www.writtingessays.com/ help.

• Video abstracts must not go longer than 4 moments.
• This content and concentrate associated with the movie must connect straight to the scholarly research which has been accepted for book, and really should maybe maybe not stray beyond the info. We advice itself i.e. briefly outline the background/context of the study, present your research objective, outline the methods used, present the key results and then discuss the implications of the outcomes that you follow the same structure as the paper.
• The presentation and content regarding the video clip must be in a style as well as in terms which will be understandable and available to a basic medical market. The language that is main be English, but we welcome subtitles an additional language. Please avoid jargon that’ll not be acquainted to a broad audience that is medical and never make use of abbreviations.
• Writers frequently talk straight into the digital camera and/or provide a slideshow, but we encourage the usage of other relevant artistic and material that is audiosuch as for example animations, videos, still photographs, figures, infographics). If you want to use product from formerly posted work or off their sources, please receive the appropriate permissions through the publisher that is relevant copyright owner.